If, however, I had a student that tried to use the text to prove that Shakespeare was a Scientologist
See, that's about intent, and my line excludes that. I'm comfortable with discussing the text as a tract that supports Scientology -- but to say that Shakespeare was one gets into what he may really have been feeling/meant.
It makes watching reruns of the original Dragnet lots of fun. "Come on, Sgt. Friday, just hug him already!"
"Just the facts, ma'am."
"But the subtext is smacking me in the face!"
If, however, I had a student that tried to use the text to prove that Shakespeare was a Scientologist, I would try to talk them out of interpreting the text that way. Because it may be supportable, but given the arrow of time, it's not a valid interpretation.
But didn't Xenu blow up the volcanoes 70 million years ago! Shakespeare so could have been a scientologist!
now I'm pulling your leg.
I'm kinda now intrigued about the Radar piece, "The Passion of Tom Cruise."
"But the subtext is smacking me in the face!"
"If there is any subtext, ma'am, the recap at the end will tell you."
What about I Spy?
Oooh, good one to pull out. I don't think U.N.C.L.E. counts as I never got the feeling that Illya and Napoleon were pals. That may just be my unfamiliarity with the show, though.
"If there is any subtext, ma'am, the recap at the end will tell you."
"The names have been changed to protect the slashed."
Ha! I just went to IMDB to find out dates of the movies/TV shows just mentioned, and for reasons that are no doubt very specialcoincidental, a search for "Starsky & Hutch" also brings up "The Real Story of Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (1993) (V)".
I never felt the slash in I Spy, and I don't remember enough about Butch and Sundance to have an opinion.
This just sucks. Christopher Reeves' widow has lung cancer.
Wild, Wild West was Really, Really Gay.